The LHC has ruled that a citizen’s Computerized National Identity Card (CNIC) cannot be blocked to enforce a maintenance decree. The court declared that such an action has no legal basis and violates the principles of due process.
The judgment was delivered by Justice Muzamil Akhtar Shabir while hearing a petition filed by Nasir Ali Ranjha. The petitioner challenged a 2017 order issued by a Gujrat executing court. The lower court had directed the National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) to block his CNIC over the non-payment of maintenance to his wife and children.
According to the petitioner, the executing court acted beyond its legal authority. He argued that there is no provision in the law allowing a civil court to block a CNIC to recover maintenance payments.
During the proceedings, the respondent maintained that the measure was necessary. She argued that the petitioner had repeatedly failed to comply with the maintenance decree while living abroad. According to her, blocking the CNIC was intended to encourage compliance with the court’s order.
After reviewing the case, the LHC referred to recent judgments of both the Supreme Court and the Lahore High Court. Justice Shabir observed that the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure do not authorize courts to block a citizen’s identity card for the enforcement of a maintenance decree.
The judge explained that a CNIC is an essential identity document. It is required for many everyday activities in Pakistan. Citizens need it to obtain passports, open bank accounts, secure employment, access government services, travel, and appear before courts.
The court further noted that blocking a CNIC directly affects several constitutional rights. Because of its importance, any restriction on its use must be clearly supported by law.
Justice Shabir also examined the NADRA Ordinance. He stated that a CNIC may only be canceled, confiscated, or impounded in limited circumstances prescribed by law. These include cases involving fraud, forgery, or legal ineligibility. The law does not permit blocking a CNIC simply to enforce a civil court decree.
Based on these findings, the LHC declared the 2017 order of the Gujrat executing court to be without lawful authority. The court directed that the petitioner’s CNIC be restored immediately.
However, the judgment also clarified that restoring the CNIC does not end the maintenance case. The legal proceedings for the recovery of maintenance will continue according to the applicable laws.
In other related news also read Lahore Smog Crisis: LHC Issues Strict Environmental Orders
The ruling highlights the importance of following due process while enforcing court orders. It also reinforces that judicial powers must remain within the limits established by the Constitution and existing laws. The decision is expected to serve as an important legal reference in future cases involving CNIC restrictions and the enforcement of civil court decrees.
