[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text dp_text_size=”size-4″]The US Supreme Court has intervened to temporarily block Texas’ controversial immigration-enforcement legislation, known as SB4, granting state authorities the power to arrest and expel undocumented migrants entering the country. Justice Samuel Alito’s intervention postpones the law’s enforcement until March 13, with further court deliberations expected. Texas has until March 11 to respond.
SB4, signed into law by Governor Abbott in December, raised concerns among immigration advocates due to fears of potential racial profiling and civil liberties violations. The law provides broad authority to state officials for the arrest, prosecution, and deportation of individuals irregularly crossing the Mexico-US border.
Read more: US Judge Halts Texas Law, Supporting Immigration
Initially set to take effect on March 5, SB4 faced legal challenges, criticized as the most aggressive state-led immigration policing since Arizona’s controversial law over a decade ago.
Responding to the Department of Justice’s plea for intervention, the Supreme Court cited concerns about SB4’s impact on federal immigration enforcement and US-Mexico diplomatic relations. The Biden administration argues that SB4 contradicts federal authority over immigration matters, a jurisdiction upheld for nearly 150 years.
Governor Abbott defends SB4 as a necessary response to perceived federal immigration policy laxity, while opponents view it as a threat to constitutional principles and community tensions. The Supreme Court’s decision to halt SB4’s implementation underscores the vital role of judicial scrutiny in upholding constitutional rights amid contentious policy debates.
This intervention follows a federal judge’s recent setback to another contentious law, with Judge David Alan asserting that SB4, if allowed, could pave the way for each state to enact its own immigration laws.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
