Justice Ayesha has stated that the 26th Amendment does not bar a full court from hearing cases before a Constitutional Bench, generating fresh discussions on judicial powers in Pakistan. Her remarks come amid ongoing debates about the authority of the Chief Justice and the procedural limits introduced by recent amendments.
In a recent full court meeting, Justice Ayesha highlighted that while the 26th Amendment outlines certain powers and restrictions, it does not prevent the full court from exercising its authority over cases that require interpretation of the Constitution. She stressed that the Constitutional Bench retains its role in resolving major legal questions, ensuring that amendments do not undermine judicial oversight.
The discussion also addressed concerns raised by legal experts regarding the scope of the Chief Justice’s powers. Justice Ayesha emphasized that judicial discretion remains intact and that amendments should not interfere with the judiciary’s ability to review legislation and make decisions on pressing national matters. Observers noted that this clarification provides important guidance for judges navigating complex constitutional issues.
The matter has attracted attention nationwide, as legal professionals debate how amendments interact with full court procedures. Discussions are also surrounding the Chief Justice’s powers under the 26th Amendment. Analysts believe that this interpretation could influence how high-profile cases are managed in the future, reinforcing the principle that judicial authority cannot be curtailed by procedural amendments.
Justice Ayesha’s statement underlines the importance of maintaining judicial autonomy while adhering to constitutional mandates. By clarifying that the 26th Amendment does not limit full court hearings, she has provided a framework for balancing legal procedure with the need for constitutional oversight. The ongoing debate around the powers of the Chief Justice and full court hearings is expected to continue, but this clarification brings much-needed clarity for both the judiciary and the public, strengthening confidence in Pakistan’s legal system.
