A strongly worded letter by Supreme Court judge Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan has sparked a new debate in Pakistan’s judiciary. The letter, addressed to Islamabad High Court Chief Justice Sarfaraz Dogar, challenges the idea of using artificial intelligence (AI) in judicial decision-making.
The development comes after a recent full court meeting where judges discussed the potential role of AI in the judicial system. While AI has been considered for research and case management, the prospect of allowing it to play a role in decision-making has raised serious concerns.
In his letter, Justice Ejaz Ishaq Khan warned against delegating judicial authority to artificial intelligence. He stressed that while technology can support the judiciary, it cannot replace human judgment. According to him, judicial decision-making requires values such as conscience, morality, and independent reasoning—qualities that AI lacks.
The judge argued that justice is not just about interpreting legal texts or analyzing data. It also involves empathy, ethical reflection, and a deep understanding of human circumstances. “AI may be a powerful tool,” he noted, “but it cannot grasp the essence of justice, which lies in human wisdom and conscience.”
His concerns reflect a growing debate across the world, where legal systems are increasingly exploring the use of technology. In some countries, AI tools are already assisting in predicting case outcomes or identifying legal precedents. However, the idea of replacing or even partially automating judicial rulings remains highly controversial.
Supporters of AI in courts argue that it can reduce delays, minimize human error, and improve efficiency in a backlog-heavy system like Pakistan’s. But critics, including Justice Ejaz Ishaq Khan, caution that over-reliance on technology could erode the principles of fairness and impartiality.
The letter has now been circulated among all Supreme Court judges, ensuring that the debate will continue at the highest judicial levels. Analysts believe this exchange may shape how Pakistan balances technological innovation with the preservation of judicial independence.
Public trust in the judiciary depends on the belief that decisions are made by individuals who understand social context, human suffering, and ethical responsibility. Justice Ejaz Ishaq Khan’s stance highlights the risks of removing that human element.
Around the world, debates over AI and its role in law, politics, and governance continue to gain attention. Similarly, controversies tied to powerful figures show how sensitive matters of accountability can resurface at any time. Recently, Prince Andrew faced renewed scrutiny over past allegations after a memoir threatened to reignite scandal. Read more here.
For now, Justice Ejaz Ishaq Khan’s letter ensures that Pakistan’s judiciary will tread cautiously before allowing artificial intelligence to play any role in decision-making.
