A major political and constitutional debate has erupted after the Pentagon confirmed that U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth accepted a Boeing 747 jet offered by Qatar for presidential use. The aircraft, intended to serve as a new Air Force One, has drawn sharp criticism due to its foreign origin and the legal implications under the U.S. Constitution’s Emoluments Clause.
Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell defended the decision, saying it complies with all federal rules and regulations, and that necessary security and functional assessments will be handled by the U.S. Air Force. Despite these assurances, the move has ignited concerns over national security and the ethics of accepting such an extravagant gift from a foreign state.
Also Read: Trump Announces $200 Billion Worth of Deals During UAE Visit
President Donald Trump dismissed the backlash, praising the offer as a “great gesture” and ridiculing the notion of rejecting a “very expensive airplane” as foolish. The president’s comments have only deepened the partisan divide, with critics accusing him of prioritizing personal gain over constitutional safeguards.
In response, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer introduced the Presidential Airlift Security Act to block the use of the Qatari jet. He warned of the billions that could be spent on retrofitting the aircraft, and questioned whether such a plane could ever meet the security standards necessary to carry the commander-in-chief.
