A legal dispute has surfaced after a press release issued by the Inland Revenue Service Officers Association (IRSOA) was formally challenged through a detailed legal notice. The notice alleges defamation, false claims, and misuse of institutional authority against a senior lawyer.
According to sources, the legal notice was sent on behalf of an advocate of the **Supreme Court ** of Pakistan. The notice claims the press release wrongly accused the lawyer of acting with malice. It also alleged misuse of criminal proceedings, which the notice strongly denies.
The advocate is known for public interest litigation and legal actions against maladministration. The notice states that the accusations damaged the lawyer’s professional reputation. It adds that the claims were baseless and issued with harmful intent.
The legal notice argues that such statements violate constitutional protections. It says lawyers have the right to seek legal remedies without facing public attacks. The notice further says the role of institutional bodies must remain within legal limits.
Support from Lahore Tax Bar Association
The Lahore Tax Bar Association has publicly supported the advocate. The association passed formal resolutions backing the legal position taken by the lawyer. It described the actions against the advocate as retaliatory.
The association demanded protection under the Lawyers Welfare and Protection Act, 2023. Copies of the resolutions were sent to senior authorities. These included the Chairman of the Federal Board of Revenue and the Punjab Bar Council.
Legal demands outlined
The legal notice calls for an immediate withdrawal of the press release. It also demands a public apology with equal visibility. A written assurance to avoid similar actions in the future was also requested.
In addition, the advocate has sought Rs. 100 million in damages. The amount is claimed for reputational harm and professional loss. The notice states that such compensation is justified under law.
Concerns over institutional conduct
Legal experts say the issue raises serious questions. They point to the conduct of official associations commenting on legal matters. The case also highlights limits on public statements involving pending cases.
The matter may impact how institutions address disputes with lawyers. It may also strengthen safeguards for the legal profession. Observers believe the outcome could shape future standards of accountability.
The case is expected to draw attention from the **Supreme Court ** and legal circles nationwide. It may also influence how state-linked bodies communicate publicly. Many see it as a test of professional independence and legal ethics.
In other related news also read Pakistan Taps Bitcoin Advocate Saylor to Craft Crypto Policy
As proceedings continue, the role of the **Supreme Court ** in upholding constitutional values remains central.
